Good Night, and Good Luck.
Last week, I went and saw Good Night, and Good Luck. I realize that some of you might think this doesn’t have much to do with the general topic of my blog, but I think it does. It gives meaning to what we as bloggers are doing. I went into this movie thinking it was going to be another L.A. Confidential – a crime film based in the 50s, but instead of focusing on cops, this movie was going to focus on reporters. I was wrong in a few aspects. The movie did revolve around reporters in the 1950s, but more importantly a CBS reporter named Edward Murrow and his coverage the McCarthy trials. Another mistake I made was thinking this movie was fiction.
What struck me about this film and why I mention it today is the impact Murrow had on journalism, and the media’s responsibility to be a political watchdog.
The film begins with Morrow being honored at the Radio-Television News Directors Association & Foundation Convention on Oct. 15, 1958. He begins his speech:
This just might do nobody any good. At the end of this discourse a few people may accuse this reporter of fouling his own comfortable nest, and your organization may be accused of having given hospitality to heretical and even dangerous thoughts. But the elaborate structure of networks, advertising agencies and sponsors will not be shaken or altered. It is my desire, if not my duty, to try to talk to you journeymen with some candor about what is happening to radio and television.There is a flashback, and the audience is in the newsroom years ago with reporters bustling around and secretaries delivering coffee. The movie goes on to tell of Murrow’s convictions that what McCarthy accusation was doing was wrong and unconstitutional. The problem during the time was reporters and journalists were afraid to do stories disagreeing with McCarthy because then they to would be black listed.
In Murrow’s awards speech, he mentions many things that are so relevant now.
Our history will be what we make it. And if there are any historians about fifty or a hundred years from now, and there should be preserved the kinescopes for one week of all three networks, they will there find recorded in black and white, or color, evidence of decadence, escapism and insulation from the realities of the world in which we live. I invite your attention to the television schedules of all networks between the hours of 8 and 11 p.m., Eastern Time. Here you will find only fleeting and spasmodic reference to the fact that this nation is in mortal danger.These are excerpts from the speech he gave in 1958. I believe that blogs and the Internet have become to voice of the people. It is the place where people are saying things that others don’t want to hear but need to.
For surely we shall pay for using this most powerful instrument of communication to insulate the citizenry from the hard and demanding realities which must be faced if we are to survive. I mean the word survive literally.
I am entirely persuaded that the American public is more reasonable, restrained and more mature than most of our industry's program planners believe. Their fear of controversy is not warranted by the evidence. I have reason to know, as do many of you, that when the evidence on a controversial subject is fairly and calmly presented, the public recognizes it for what it is--an effort to illuminate rather than to agitate.
But this nation is now in competition with malignant forces of evil who are using every instrument at their command to empty the minds of their subjects and fill those minds with slogans, determination and faith in the future. If we go on as we are, we are protecting the mind of the American public from any real contact with the menacing world that squeezes in upon us. We are engaged in a great experiment to discover whether a free public opinion can devise and direct methods of managing the affairs of the nation. We may fail. But we are handicapping ourselves needlessly.
George Clooney is the director of this movie and a staunch liberal. I’m positive the Clooney’s main purpose in making this film is to illustrate the parallels between the Red Scare and current Iraq war. During the McCarthy era, if you disagreed with what the government was doing or how McCarthy was singling out people without evidence, you were considered a communist. Currently, the situation is very similar. If you oppose the Iraq War and disagree with Bush, you might be called unpatriotic or disloyal.
The final part of Murrow’s speech had a definite ring of truth and timelessness.
To those who say people wouldn't look; they wouldn't be interested; they're too complacent, indifferent and insulated, I can only reply: There is, in one reporter's opinion, considerable evidence against that contention. But even if they are right, what have they got to lose? Because if they are right, and this instrument is good for nothing but to entertain, amuse and insulate, then the tube is flickering now and we will soon see that the whole struggle is lost.I strongly suggest reading Morrow’s entire speech.
This instrument can teach, it can illuminate; yes, and it can even inspire. But it can do so only to the extent that humans are determined to use it to those ends. Otherwise it is merely wires and lights in a box. There is a great and perhaps decisive battle to be fought against ignorance, intolerance and indifference. This weapon of television could be useful.
The reason I mentioned this movie and Murrow is because it brought to my attention the importance of what we as bloggers are doing – especially the bloggers who are doing investigative reporting and discovering important things that aren’t being reported on the news. It is not always popular to believe the truth, but it is still the truth, and someone needs to say it. I believe Murrow was one of those people for radio and television, and unfortunately I cannot name one journalist now that I feel has done the same thing.
